| The Child has been abducted to a Contracting State | Text version |
Finland is a party to two international conventions which aim at restoring abducted children to other Contracting States:
Since in practice only the Hague Convention on Child Abduction is applied, this booklet deals exclusively with that.
The Finnish provisions on child abduction are to be found in the Child Custody and Right of Access Act (361/1983, amended 186/1994).
The above acts and conventions can also be found on the Internet, at the address http://www.finlex.fi. The site is maintained by the Ministry of Justice and can be accessed free of charge.
The Hague Convention on Child Abduction has been in force in Finland since 1994. The other Contracting States are (11/2011):
Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Australia,
Austria
Bahamas, Belarus
Belgium, Belize
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Canada, Chile,
Columbia, Costa Rica,
Croatia, Cyprus,
Czech Republic
Denmark,Dominican Republic
Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia
Fiji, France
Georgia, Germany
Great Britain, Greece, Guatemala
Honduras, Hong Kong,
Hungary
Ireland, Iceland,
Israel, Italy
Latvia, Lithuania
Luxembourg, Macau
Macedonia, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico
Moldavia, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco
Netherlands, New Zealand,
Nicaragua, Norway
Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland,
Portugal
Romania
South Africa, Spain, Sweden,
Saint Kitts and Nevis, San Marino, Serbia, Seychelles
Slovakia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Switzerland
Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey
Turkmenistan, Ukrain,
United States, Uruguay
Venezuela
Zimbabwe
For an updated list of Contracting States, see http://www.finlex.fi (Valtiosopimukset - viitetiedot) or http://www.hcch.net (Homepage of the Hague Conference on Private International Law)
The purpose of the Hague Convention on Child Abduction is to combat international child abduction. The key aim of the Convention is to return children that have been wrongfully removed from the State of their habitual residence. Wrongful removal is equated with wrongful retention of children for example at the end of a period of exercise of the right of access to a child. Habitual residence in this context means the state where a child de facto lives and where his or her principal living environment is.
For a removal of a child (from Finland to another Contracting State) to be considered wrongful the following requirements must be met:
A decision on the return of a child does not, however, involve a decision concerning the custody of the child. This means that it is in no way a conclusion on which parent would be the best custodian. After the child has been returned, proceedings relating to the custody of the child will take place in the State of habitual residence. The courts of this State are considered to be best qualified to ascertain the best interests of the child.
There are situations where the State required to return the child can refuse to do so.
The grounds for refusal are the following
The Ministry of Justice is the Central Authority whose duty is to discharge the tasks imposed by the Child Abduction Convention.
The Central Authority shall take measures
Pursuant to Section 35 of the Child Custody and Right of Access Act the State and municipal welfare authorities shall, upon request, provide the Ministry of Justice with executive assistance for ascertaining the whereabouts and the circumstances of a child, for securing return of a child and for preventing the wrongful removal of a child.
When a parent suspects that his or her child has been wrongfully removed to another Contracting State, he or she shall contact the Central Authority, i.e. the Ministry of Justice, either directly or through a lawyer. The International Affairs Unit of the Ministry provides advice relating to the interpretation of the Child Abduction Convention and to the drafting of the application.
An application for the return of the child has to be made. The application shall contain:
The application shall be sent to the Ministry of Justice, where it will be translated and sent to the proper foreign Central Authority.